bluire | fragments » 2009 » December

Archive for December, 2009

strike memory

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

on strike

on strike

swimming in Argeles.

Everyone feels like striking sometimes, so I understand why some public sector workers might want to strike now.

This is me striking, in September, SK and I went for a cycle. It was warm. On the way home, I got tired of cycling and staged a mini strike. I took off across the sand. Let my bike lying on the sand, removed my beach dress and jumped into the sea before SK could catch up with me. With a sea llike that, how could you resist. One of life’s great pleasures is swimming in warmer (than the Atlantic) water under a clear blue sky.

budget backlash

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

I’ve been listening to the Dail speeches in reply to Brian Lenihan’s speech. As someone who will have a small baby to feed, clothe and put nappys on next May, I feel that I am entitled to weigh in on the debate over child benefit.
The problem with child benefit isn’t that it has been reduced, the problem with child benefit is that it is a universal payment.
In my circumstances, unless both SK and I lose our jobs (and I think that is reasonably unlikely for both of us to lose our jobs at the moment) we are not going to be affected in an adverse way over 16 euro a month less in MONEY FOR FREE or should I call it by it’s proper name, child benefit.
The way I look at child benefit is this. We are choosing to bring a baby into this country. We choose to do that in full knowledge that our home purchased near to the top of the boom is in negative equity should we need to sell it tomorrow. We don’t need to sell it, so it’s not actually an issue. We choose parenthood knowing what childcare costs every month. We choose parenthood knowing how much GP visits cost, how much babysitting costs, how much milk for the babby costs (nothing if you breast feed for six months, but that’s another story). We choose parenthood knowing what all the studies on the cost of raising children say it costs. We choose parenthood knowing what private schools cost, what school books cost, what school uniforms cost, what university costs, what gap years in South America costs, what extra-cirricular demands like ponies and dinghies cost. We still choose it. So it is our responsibility. It is nice that the government chooses to help us out and gives us (let me write it again) MONEY FOR FREE. If the government wants to increase that money or decrease that money, that is their decision. Bottom line, when you are getting money for free, you should be thankful for what you get and stop whining about the decrease.
To say that the decrease in child benefit and the abolishment of the early childcare supplement will declare us (as a family, lumped in with all families by those declaring this small decrease a disaster) destitute with no milk for the babby and no way to clothe the babby is complete nonsense.
So what is a solution. Well, you could tax child benefit. But to tax child benefit would actually mean that everyone in receipt of it would need to be in the tax system. You could means test child benefit, but to do that would require honesty about bank (overseas or domestic) accounts and credit union accounts and actual income on the part of applicants. Or, you can apply a reduction across the board. A reduction across the board seems quite fair to me given the deflation in the economy and the decrease in the basic costs of living. People say their costs of living have not decreased. That is complete nonsense. How can they not have when the ESRI and CSO are saying that they have and they have the statistics to back up these claims. I also have statistics to back up these claims. The statistics are our gas bill, our electricity bill, our mortgage and our grocery bill.

When I hear Joan Burton in the Dail saying that the decrease in child benefit is going to affect the people with the sliced pans and sausages in the shopping trollies rather than fresh meat and veg, I scratch my head. I go online to superquinn and discover the price of sausages and some kinds of fresh meat per kilo. Sausages, per kilo, of various brands, Denny, Superquinn own brand and others are MORE EXPENSIVE than certain types of fresh meat. Sliced pans per kilo are MORE EXPENSIVE that kilos of potatoes. If child benefit is going to be summarised by Joan Burton as making life harder for the sausages and sliced bread brigade, then I say this. Let them have cooking lessons. Let them learn how to feed their children with fish, meat and potatoes, which are cheaper than sausages and sliced pans, and more nutritious to boot. What is a white sliced pan if it isn’t empty calories with no nutritional content.

Please note, I absolutely sympathise with public sector workers who have had a pay cut, they will find a large gap in their pockets and I do actually sympathise with those cuts, despite thinking that they were necessary. But if you are complaining solely about child benefit cuts whilst still employed, don’t be so dramatic and don’t think it is going to ruin your life. There are so many ways to earn sixteen euro a month. Show some initiative instead of expecting the government to bail you out at every turn.

christmas excess

Monday, December 7th, 2009

I don’t identify with Christmas, my new tiding is “Good Yule”. For much of my teenage and adult life, my memories of Christmas have been associated with hassle. Hassle for my Grandmother, hassle for my mother, hassle for me. Hassle mainly tied up with cooking, shopping, laying in the crackers, (it is difficult to find nice crackers). Making sure there was enough to eat for all. For a few days. Cos, Christmas shopping ended on the 23d usually and it didn’t enter anyone’s head again until the 27th or 28th, and then, only for perishables, like milk. Hassle of deciding what would be eaten every day. The cooking hassle passed from Gran, to Mum, to me. I became familiar with cooking for ten or twelve people very early on in life. This year I am going to my parents-in-laws for Christmas for the first time, and such is the hassle of Christmas for women that is engraved on my brain, I rang SK from Blackrock the other day to ask him what size ham did he think we should bring with us. “Why would you bring a ham?” he asked. “Um, because your parents eat ham on Christmas Eve (observed when they were in my sister-in-law’s house), because, we are going to your parents for Christmas, and you can’t expect them to feed and water you for three or four days, what were you going to bring?” SK’s reply, “There’s no need to bring anything”. That sums up in detail the male and female approach to Christmas I think. Women worry about what people will eat. Men don’t worry about it. Women will go home with groceries and wine, speciality foodstuffs to enjoy for all, men will just arrive.

Yule isn’t just about the problems of the grocery shopping and cooking hassle, it is also the present hassle. Christmas shopping spending exploded from when I was an impoverished student earning pocket money by working in a cafe to a month or two spent paying off the credit card cos you were now earning. Pricewatch today has an article of the Christmas spending of the boom versus the recession and the expectations and pressures it put upon people. Only if you buy into that consumer culture does it put pressure to you, but it doesn’t take a genius to work out that the excessive spending and levels of personal “lifestyle” debt associated with Celtic Tiger years meant that everyone in the country in posession of a credit card came under huge Christmas pressure. Even me.

Pricewatch forgot to suggest Secret Santa. That is the most recession friendly method ever. Obviously it won’t work for Santa presents, but for everything else, it works really well. For parents struggling with Santa presents and Christmas demands, where is the imagination? If you can get a child to believe in Santa, then you can get a child to believe in Environmentally Friendly Santa, with a much smaller, more fuel efficient sleigh, who can only bring one present per child as he wants to protect the polar bears and keep the ice in the North Pole, otherwise, he will be left with no magical place to live and there will be no Christmases in the future, because children were too greedy in the noughties and tweenie years and the greenhouse gases from his sleigh caused all the ice to melt because he contributed so much gas into the atmosphere travelling at super-sonic speed on Christmas Eve. His smaller sleigh reduces his emissions to ten percent of what they used to be, and only one, small present fits on the sleigh. Those are Santa’s rules.