Via Maman Poulet I came across this article in the Irish Independent on blogging. It was a catch all article with an Irish flavour. But, there were a couple of mistakes in it. As usual. I am sure there are always lots of inaccuracies in articles, but when you know the topic well enough to pick them out, they are actually really annoying, if you are an anally retentive pick nitter like I can be.
For starters, Teresa’s blog is windsandbreezes.org and not “windandbreeze”. That is a very important distinction.
With relation to the statement that
Nobody can be certain how many Irish blogs exist
That may indeed be true, but, good places to start are the aggregators planet of the blogs and irish blogs. Why were they not mentioned I wonder?
Another thing I don’t understand is the whole clevage obsession that this reporter has. According to him, cleavage played a factor in both the dismissals of Le Petit Anglaise and Ellen Simonetti. I am not so sure that cleavage is true in either case. Ellen Simonetti was dismissed for posing in her uniform. A look at the photographs doesn’t reveal very much in the cleavage department either. Le Petit Anglaise did post an entry with a cleavage story, but there were also other entries. It wasn’t just about cleavage.
The article also says Gizmondo is the fifth most popular blog in the world. Whilst it is extremely popular, according to Technorati, it is ranked fourteenth. I am not sure where it is rated fifth and I would like to know where it is rated fifth, but there is no source of this information/fact published.
Gavin Sheridan, of Gavin’s blog, is reportedly Dublin based, but isn’t he attending UCC? Which, would make him based in Cork and not Dublin for convenience sake if nothing else. That is just utter laziness of fact checking.
Failure to mention any tools such as wordpress or movable type is also very interesting. Typepad was mentioned, but not sixapart. Wordpress also does hosted blogs that are simple to set up. But they didn’t get mentioned. None of the personalities behind blogging software are deemed worthy of a mention either, RSS is ignored, as is the whole factor of commenting and trackbacks which are all reasons for blogging and reading blogs.
Is this article an indication of the poor standards of fact checking, verification and publishing in the Independent I wonder, or is it part of the difficulty in trying to encompass the history of blogging? I can’t figure it out. All in all, I thought it was fairly poor. Then again, it is the Indo, so I am probably expecting too much.